首页> 外文OA文献 >A new method for determination of most likely landslide initiation points and the evaluation of digital terrain model scale in terrain stability mapping
【2h】

A new method for determination of most likely landslide initiation points and the evaluation of digital terrain model scale in terrain stability mapping

机译:确定最可能的滑坡起始点并评估地形稳定性映射中数字地形模型比例的新方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper introduces a new approach for determining the most likely initiation points for landslides from potential instability mapped using a terrain stability model. This approach identifies the location with critical stability index from a terrain stability model on each downslope path from ridge to valley. Any measure of terrain stability may be used with this approach, which here is illustrated using results from SINMAP, and from simply taking slope as an index of potential instability. The relative density of most likely landslide initiation points within and outside mapped landslide scars provides a way to evaluate the effectiveness of a terrain stability measure, even when mapped landslide scars include run out zones, rather than just initiation locations. This relative density was used to evaluate the utility of high resolution terrain data derived from airborne laser altimetry (LIDAR) for a small basin located in the Northeastern Region of Italy. Digital Terrain Models were derived from the LIDAR data for a range of grid cell sizes (from 2 to 50 m). We found appreciable differences between the density of most likely landslide initiation points within and outside mapped landslides with ratios as large as three or more with the highest ratios for a digital terrain model grid cell size of 10 m. This leads to two conclusions: (1) The relative density from a most likely landslide initiation point approach is useful for quantifying the effectiveness of a terrain stability map when mapped landslides do not or can not differentiate between initiation, runout, and depositional areas; and (2) in this study area, where landslides occurred in complexes that were sometimes more than 100 m wide, a digital terrain model scale of 10 m is optimal. Digital terrain model scales larger than 10 m result in loss of resolution that degrades the results, while for digital terrain model scales smaller than 10 m the physical processes responsible for triggering landslides are obscured by smaller scale terrain variability.
机译:本文介绍了一种新方法,该方法可根据使用地形稳定性模型绘制的潜在不稳定性确定滑坡最可能的起点。这种方法根据从山脊到山谷的每个下坡路径上的地形稳定性模型,使用临界稳定性指数来识别位置。此方法可使用任何地形稳定性度量,此处使用SINMAP的结果以及仅将坡度作为潜在不稳定性的指标进行说明。即使在映射的滑坡疤痕包括耗尽区域而不只是起始位置的情况下,映射的滑坡疤痕内部和外部最可能的滑坡起始点的相对密度也可以评估地形稳定措​​施的有效性。该相对密度用于评估从机载激光测高仪(LIDAR)获得的高分辨率地形数据对意大利东北地区小盆地的实用性。数字地形模型是从LIDAR数据中得出的,其网格范围为2至50 m。我们发现,在10 m的数字地形模型网格单元中,映射的滑坡内外的最可能滑坡起始点的密度之间存在明显的差异,其比率高达3或更大,且比率最高。这得出两个结论:(1)当测绘的滑坡不能或不能区分起裂区,径流和沉积区时,最有可能的滑坡始发点方法的相对密度可用于量化地形稳定性图的有效性; (2)在这个研究区域中,滑坡发生在有时超过100 m宽的复杂区域中,因此10 m的数字地形模型比例是最佳的。大于10 m的数字地形模型比例尺会导致分辨率降低,从而降低结果,而对于小于10 m的数字地形模型比例尺,负责触发滑坡的物理过程会因较小的比例尺地形变化而被遮盖。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tarolli, Paolo; Tarboton, Dg;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号